QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

نویسندگان

  • Penny F Whiting
  • Anne W S Rutjes
  • Marie E Westwood
  • Susan Mallett
  • Jonathan J Deeks
  • Johannes B Reitsma
  • Mariska M G Leeflang
  • Jonathan A C Sterne
  • Patrick M M Bossuyt
چکیده

In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Quality Assessment of Research Articles in Nuclear Medicine Using STARD and QUADAS-2 Tools

Objective(s): Diagnostic nuclear medicine is being increasingly employed in clinical practice with the advent of new technologies and radiopharmaceuticals. The report of the prevalence of a certain disease is important for assessing the quality of that article. Therefore, this study was performed to evaluate the quality of published nuclear medicine articles and determine the frequency of repor...

متن کامل

Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

BACKGROUND A quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies, named QUADAS, has recently been developed. Although QUADAS has been used in several systematic reviews, it has not been formally validated. The objective was to evaluate the validity and usefulness of QUADAS. METHODS Three reviewers independently rated the quality of 30 studies using QUADAS. We assessed the proportion of ag...

متن کامل

Quality assessment of diagnostic before-after studies: development of methodology in the context of a systematic review

BACKGROUND Quality assessment tools for primary studies of test accuracy are relatively well developed, although only one is validated (QUADAS), but very little work has been done to develop tools to quality-assess studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic testing on management of patients (diagnostic or therapeutic yield). The recent draft NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal (2...

متن کامل

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

BACKGROUND In the era of evidence based medicine, with systematic reviews as its cornerstone, adequate quality assessment tools should be available. There is currently a lack of a systematically developed and evaluated tool for the assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. The aim of this project was to combine empirical evidence and expert opinion in a formal consensus method to develop a too...

متن کامل

QUADAS and STARD: evaluating the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.

OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of two approaches, one based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) and another on the Standards for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD), in evaluating the quality of studies validating the OptiMal® rapid malaria diagnostic test. METHODS Articles validating the rapid test published until 2007 were searched in the Med...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Annals of internal medicine

دوره 155 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011